Skip to main content
Gassnova
 
Search button icon
  • Newsletter
  • News & media
  • Organisation
  • Contact
  • CCS dictionary
  • About Gassnova
    • Carbon Capture and Storage
    • CCS Knowledge
    • About Gassnova
  • Research and development (CLIMIT)
    • Main
    • Apply for funding
    • Projects
    • About CLIMIT Programme
    • CLIMIT`s Project Portfolio
    • CLIMIT Summit
    • USA & Norway Collaboration
  • Demo of CO2-capture (TCM)
  • Experience from Longship
    • Main
    • About Longship
    • Search in documents/reports from Longship
    • Timeline
View all posts in news News
Teksten CO2 i sort som det ryker av. Grafisk illustrasjon.

08.03.2023

Sharing learning about regulation of CCS chain

Longship will provide learning related to the regulation and incentivization of CO2 management activities that others can benefit from. As Langskip is the first entire CCS chain to be regulated in Norway, the interface between regulatory authorities had to be clarified.

How dangerous are CO2 emissions?

One of the main risk areas for the CCS chain is the risk associated with handling large amounts of CO2.
CO2 differs from hydrocarbons in many ways, and it is important to note that it does not ignite like hydrocarbons. There is therefore no risk of explosion due to ignition. CO2 is not harmful to living organisms in low concentrations. HSE risks are linked to overpressure and leakage of large volumes. Leakage of large volumes with high concentrations of CO2 is harmful to most living organisms and should be avoided. Read more about safe storage of CO2 here.

The interface between regulatory authorities needed clarification

Experience from the Langskip project showed that the interface between the regulatory authorities, The Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) and the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway, needed clarification.

DSB (supervisory authority on land) regulates plant handling of hazardous substances, including pressurized CO2. The Directorate has given the necessary consents to the industrial partners in Langskip.
The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (offshore supervisory authority) has the regulatory responsibility for safety, working environment, preparedness and safety in the petroleum sector. They have developed new regulations on safety and the working environment when transporting and injecting CO2 on the continental shelf (the CO2 safety regulations).

During the planning of the transport and storage infrastructure in Longship, it turned out that it was not clear where DSB’s responsibility stopped and the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway began. Regarding the intermediate storage of CO2 on land before transport in a pipeline for permanent storage in a reservoir under the seabed, DSB and the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway have generally agreed on the following:

  • DSB is the responsible authority for handling CO2 on land. This applies both at the capture facilities and in the intermediate storage before transport by pipeline.
  • The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway is responsible for transport in the pipeline from the export pump upstream. It includes the necessary equipment and piping systems for operation and maintenance of the pipeline, as well as equipment and systems for well monitoring and control, and associated emergency and safety systems in connection with the pipeline and injection well. However, this is an interface that can be complicated for the receiving facilities. There may therefore be a need for concrete assessments of where the interface should go.

This article was written based on the report «Regulatory lessons learned from Longship», which is based on the experiences gained from the Longship project.

Regulatory lessons learned from Longship
Related articles
En hånd holder et CO2-reduserende symbol. Foto med grafikk.

Responsibility for CO₂ in the chain

The Longship CCS project is the first of its kind in the world, and the only CCS project under construction in Europe. The project consists of the two capture operators Heidelberg Materials (ETS sector) and Hafslund Oslo Celsio (non-ETS sector) and the transport and storage operator, Northern Lights. Being the first project of its kind …

Jente med langt hår står og ser på et langskip med nordlyset i taket over. Foto/illustrasjon.

Tailored state aid agreements are necessary

Experience from the Longship project shows that, due to a lack of commercial incentives for industry partners and whole chain risks that could not be absorbed by industry partners, tailored state aid agreements were necessary. State aid for industry partners Since CCS was not commercially viable when the Longship project began, it was necessary to …

Bilde av hender som skriver på en bærbar pc. Foto.

New report from Gassnova about Longship

The report “Regulatory lessons learned from Longship” is written by Gassnova. In this report the regulatory issues and challenges facing Longship and how these are resolved are discussed in light of the state’s different roles. – We are very pleased that we now can share this report which we believe will be useful for everyone …

footer logo

CCS Norway is developed by Gassnova, the Norwegian state enterprise for CCS. The aim is to share knowledge with industries, governments and others.

Contact
Email: postmottak@gassnova.no
  • linkedin social icon
  • youtube social icon
GASSNOVA © 2025
Web design & Web development by Increo
webmaster Privacy policy